[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51000: The Web manual situation is still needlessly confusing
From: |
John Kehayias |
Subject: |
bug#51000: The Web manual situation is still needlessly confusing |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 04:19:41 +0000 |
Hi everyone,
Definitely agree with needing this to be clearer than it is currently. As a new
user I was a bit confused over the different manual versions on the website
(which is still how I prefer to read the manual). As a side note, when
searching online with Guix questions, I think I only see the 'stable' version
come up in results.
We could perhaps be clearer in what is meant by the 'stable'/1.3.0
documentation. Seems this is mostly needed in preparing for installation (with
the 1.3.0 image, not if building a current install image, of course) and during
installation. Afterward, users will probably run a guix pull very soon (as in
Getting Started, or as recommended by the guix command itself) and thus no
longer be on the 1.3.0 manual. I'm not sure how best to communicate this on the
website, but to me it is related to the next point:
I think we need something describing what we mean by Guix versions and
releases, perhaps in the Intro and/or Getting Started sections (and on an About
type page?). I was confused by this starting out, as I'm used to rolling
distros like Arch (or, a long time ago, distros like Debian). While Guix is
mostly 'rolling', we also have releases with certain package changes (like
core-updates) and Guix changes. Just a simple description would I think help
new users and give better context for the manual versions, however we label or
make them available.
I'm happy to take a stab and making either of these points clearer, especially
as one newer to Guix with these questions and assumptions nearer to mind.
John