bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51866: OCaml4.07: build fail because Dune version


From: Julien Lepiller
Subject: bug#51866: OCaml4.07: build fail because Dune version
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:18:33 -0500
User-agent: K-9 Mail for Android

I plan to get rid of ocaml4.07* at some point. For that, I'll need to import a bunch of packages (ocaml-core and friends, at least). Will see if I have enough time for that.

Le 15 novembre 2021 07:59:53 GMT-05:00, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi,

These OCaml packages fail to build because some issue with Dune
versions, respectively:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
ocaml4.07-charinfo-width
ocaml4.07-core
ocaml4.07-core-kernel
ocaml4.07-ezjsonm
ocaml4.07-lambda-term
ocaml4.07-merlin
ocaml4.07-odoc
ocaml4.07-piqi
ocaml4.07-piqilib
ocaml4.07-ppx-expect
ocaml4.07-ppx-jane
ocaml4.07-sedlex
ocaml4.07-spawn
ocaml4.07-splittable-random
ocaml4.07-sqlite3
ocaml4.07-uri
ocaml4.07-utop
ocaml4.07-zed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

fails because:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.7 of dune is not supported.
Error: Version 2.0 of dune is not supported.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


From my understanding, more or more cases like this will happen. The
question is: do we try to fix? Or do we plan to remove ’ocaml4.07-’
packages?


Cheers,
simon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]