bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")


From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Subject: bug#53030: Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 21:36:02 +0100

Calcium,

Thanks for the report!

In future, please submit separate issues separately, it helps keep discussion, er, separate. It's easier to merge issues than to split them.

Can't (specification->package "package@version:output")

Short answer: it is not intended to work. Use specification->package+output if you want outputs. This is not a bug but a design decision. Which are not above critique, but guix-devel@ might be a better place for that.

I've considered in the past to submit a cheeky patch silently renaming specification->package+ouput to specification->package, just to avoid this FAQ. It should be almost perfectly backwards compatible in that no existing code should break with the same input.

However I think clarity the greater value here, and did not submit such a patch.

calcium via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道:
The syntaxe to specify a package version and desired output
only works on guix install package@version:output

guix remove package@version:output doesn't works

I cannot reproduce this:

 $ guix install git@2.34.0:send-email
 $ guix remove git@2.34.0:send-email
 $

Can you provide an example?

guix remove package@version doesn't works

‘package@version’ means ‘package@version:out’, not (a hypothetical) ‘package@version:*’ wildcard. It neither installs nor removes ‘all outputs’.

I did notice that, e.g.,

 $ guix install git@2:send-email
 $ guix remove git@2:send-email
guix remove: error: package 'git@2:send-email' not found in profile
 $

is asymmetrical. I wonder if there are any drawbacks to making it work.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]