[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52152: Haskell Hackage importer can create dependency cycles
From: |
Philip Munksgaard |
Subject: |
bug#52152: Haskell Hackage importer can create dependency cycles |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:10:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-386-g4174665229-fm-20220406.001-g41746652 |
Hi
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022, at 09:45, zimoun wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 at 11:04, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And the "cycle" seems expected from OneTuple.cabal:
>>
>> $ cat OneTuple-0.3.1/OneTuple.cabal
>> cabal-version: >=1.10
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> test-suite th
>> type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
>> default-language: Haskell98
>> hs-source-dirs: test
>> main-is: th.hs
>> build-depends:
>> base
>> , OneTuple
>> , template-haskell
>>
>>
>> Well, for what they are worth, based on this remark, two points:
>>
>> 1. I do not know what could be done on Guix side. An idea?
>> 2. Usually, it is recommended to follow LTS and so Stackage.
>
> I do not think it is a bug from Guix but a bug from OneTuple upstream,
> not in their version 0.2.2.1, and introduce by their version 0.3.1.
I don't think that's correct. My understanding is that it is common (perhaps
even necessary) to include the library itself in the test-suite dependencies.
For instance, the same thing appears in attoparsec. However, when importing
attoparsec, they are filtered out, and indeed we even have functionality to
filter out the package name [0], but for some reason that doesn't work for
OneTuple.
0: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/import/hackage.scm#n225