bug#55283: ‘tests/guix-shell-export-manifest.sh’ fails on aarch64-linux

[raingloom]

On Fri, 06 May 2022 00:50:21 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> The log goes like this:
> ...
> + guix shell --export-manifest gsl openblas gcc-toolchain --tune

This seems to be the important part, it looks like the CPU arch isn't
being detected.

> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1752:10 13 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In unknown file:
>           12 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 5bd2e0>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>     724:2 11 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure
> default-prompt-handle…>) In ice-9/eval.scm:
>     619:8 10 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 5c2c80>)))
> In guix/ui.scm:
>    2230:7  9 (run-guix . _)
>   2193:10  8 (run-guix-command _ . _)
> In guix/scripts/shell.scm:
>    160:17  7 (guix-shell . _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1747:15  6 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 4bd7b0 at ice-9/bo…>
> …) In srfi/srfi-37.scm:
>    201:16  5 (next-arg)
>    113:18  4 (invoke-option-processor _ _ _ _ _)
> In unknown file:
>            3 (_ #<procedure 4bd660 at srfi/srfi-37.scm:114:22 ()> # #)
>            2 (_ #<procedure 9aa9c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:798:28 ()> # #)
> In guix/transformations.scm:
>    864:25  1 (_ _ _ _ ((package ad-hoc-package "gcc-toolchain") (…)
> …)) In guix/cpu.scm:
>      94:2  0 (cpu->gcc-architecture #f)

This indicates the same to me.
But I don't know the internals of --tune well enough, so it's just a
hunch.

> guix/cpu.scm:94:2: In procedure cpu->gcc-architecture:
> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
> (expecting struct): #f
> + rm -r t-guix-manifest-12319
> FAIL tests/guix-shell-export-manifest.sh (exit status: 1)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> This is ca. 312879fddcf0713c0f1dafcc6faa089edbbb6e04.
> 
> Ludo’.