|
From: | Maxime Devos |
Subject: | bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? |
Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:59:11 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 |
On 09-08-2022 22:47, Christopher Rodriguez wrote:
Hello, I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in octal during a (chmod …) in my package definitions and then run guix style, it converts them to decimal instead. Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the actual unix chmod tool and its conventions. -- Christopher Rodriguez
'chmod' is not mentioned anywhere in (guix scripts style), so I'd think it's just an oversight. The authority on the matter would be Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Disclaimer: I'm the one that wrote that feedback. Let's not double-count my non-existent 'votes'.
Greetings, Maxime
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |