|
From: | Maxime Devos |
Subject: | bug#56322: Debbug 56322, Ruby packaging issues, ping? |
Date: | Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:27:29 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 |
On 10-10-2022 07:05, Remco van 't Veer wrote:
Hi Maxime, Thanks for taking a look again. I'll make a new patchset to correct the things you mentioned. 2022/10/09 11:15, Maxime Devos:Otherwise, not that I know of, these patches appear straightforward. They might need to be done on core-updates though -- unless this has changed, IIRC ruby-asciidoctor is deep in the package graph.What's the protocol for "doing on core-updates"? I guess I can rebase on that but who will or should pick up these patches? Is there somebody I need to ping?
It's the same as master (no separate people), but to avoid someone accidentally applying it to the wrong patch, it is recommended to prefix the subject with [PATCH core-updates] instead of [PATCH].
The manual has some information on when something should be on core-updates or master.
Greetings, Maxime.
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |