bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

[Max Brieiev]

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> From personal experience, no.  Even if you compile code ahead of time,
> there seem to be some leftovers that are deferred.  guix-emacs.el is an
> oversight, but apart from that I also other leftovers (possibly from
> init.el?)

AFAIU, the compiler is invoked any time a function is redefined or
advised, see (info "(elisp) Advising Functions"). In Emacs it is a very
common paractice to put advices around a function to modify its
behaviour. Since this happens during runtime (for example, in response
to a hook, or after you manually run some command), you should accept
the fact that native compiler may be invoked at any time as you use
Emacs.

> In Guix, this is more or less a user choice – we advertised the
> transformation by which you can opt-in to AOT compilation in a news
> entry.  Also, enforcing ahead-of-time compilation does not fix the more
> pressing issue of packages breaking with native compilation ;)

How pressing is this issue? There are literally no reports of packages
breaking due to native compilation. So this is probably the reason why
Eli considers it as a non-issue.

> To quote Eli:
>> More generally, we never expected people who have Emacs with native
>> compilation available to want to disable it.  It made no sense to us
>> during development of Emacs 28, and frankly, it still doesn't, at
>> least to me.
> I think this reasoning really falls flat in presence of any non-Emacs
> package manager.  Like, obviously wanting to natively compile packages
> managed by (dpkg, rpm, pacman, emerge, guix), but not natively
> compiling a random elisp script you just downloaded from the web is a
> legitimate use case.

If security is a concern, you should not load random Elisp in the first
place. It is much easier to just directly run harmful elisp, then to
exploit native compiler, which stays silent until after you evaluate
some (possibly harmful) elisp.