Re: bzr

[Karl Berry]

    as an example of the GNU system, and as a template for how
    GNU packages are written. Does that sound like a fair summary?

I'm afraid I don't really understand the distinction you're drawing.

At any rate, GNU packages are (and always have been) developed in more
than one way.  This is a good thing.  In the case at hand, the added
complications of dVC are not worth the benefits for all projects.  One 
technical benefit of bzr (as far as I know) is that it can be used as a
*non*-distributed VC.  Or maybe you guys consider that a drawback, I
don't know ... :).

k