[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2001 18:27:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Neal H Walfield <neal@cs.uml.edu> writes:
>
> > If so, how are we going to create a POSIX conforming implementation
> > without rewriting parts of a filesystem anyway (e.g. statistic
> > collection).
>
> What do you mean by "statistic collection"?
Basically, half of shmid_ds and retreived with
`shmctl (id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds)', e.g. number of current attaches,
shm_atime, shm_dtime and shm_ctime.
pgpcQKiFwuv2K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/08
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/08
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/10
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/10
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface,
Neal H Walfield <=
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/11
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/14
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/08