[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kernel command line
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: kernel command line |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2001 18:10:34 -0400 (EDT) |
> That's correct, but in the model of just "return null if the parent is
> gone", why is this a problem?
This model makes it impossible to guarantee an assignment of the task to
its original Hurdish ancestor. I think that guarantee is the most valuable
part of the feature, because it allows unregistered Mach tasks to be
controlled by a non-root user who created them.
- Re: kernel command line, (continued)
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/04
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/05
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/06
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/06
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/07
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/08
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/14
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/18
- Re: kernel command line, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/15