[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proc changes for rusage
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: proc changes for rusage |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 01:24:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:51:56PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I checked in different fixes for two bugs (zeroing p_pi and returning the
> wrong pid). If there are any bugs remaining in the current code, please
> describe the failure modes.
Excuse me; I should have been a bit more verbose.
There are two callers of REAP, one at wait.c:206 and the second at
wait.c:218. The first expects *PID_STATUS to be set to be set to PID
and the second expects it to be set to CHILD->p_pid. Therefore, your
patch does not fix the problem.
Secondly, the if statement at the beginning of REAP adds nothing to the
code except to make it a good deal harder to see the intension.
Therefore, I would like you to reconsider and apply my change or a
similar one.
Thanks.
pgp7ZsnDUX3H7.pgp
Description: PGP signature