[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 22:40:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:12:12PM +0000, Nuno Morgadinho wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:03:54 +0100
> Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:45:19PM +0000, Nuno Morgadinho wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here
> > > http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and I noticed on my
> > > system monitor that the cpu usage was 100%. Surely this is not normal, is
> > > it?
> >
> > cpu usage of vmware in Linux or of something in the Hurd?
>
> Cpu usage of vmware in Linux. But I also usually run Linux on vmware-Linux
> and the cpu usage is normal.
We can't help it. VM Ware is not free software, so there is nothing we can
do about it.
> > > Also, while running ./native-install the second time in my hurd
> > > installation, I had the following output (see screenshot here
> > > http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/report.png) that said to report the
> > > problem so here it is.
> >
> > The interesting errors scrolled off the screen, though :-/
> >
> > Try to boot to single user mode (-s) and run
> >
> > dpkg --configure --pending
>
> Outputs this (see http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/report2.png).
dpkg 1.9.17 seems to have most serious issues. It complains about "Status:
install ok unpacked" which seems fine to me.
Can someone verify this on a completely installed system?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de