[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?
From: |
Ondrej Hurt |
Subject: |
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:41:21 +0100 (CET) |
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:41:05PM +0100, Ondrej Hurt wrote:
> > But how will the task manager know it should delete a task and
> > perform some cleanup, if it is not told by its incapacitated
> > exception handler ? You would have to check all tasks periodically,
> > no ?
> Does it have to know? The task manager doesn't kill tasks that loop
> endlessly (in the while(1) {} sense), so why does it have to kill a
> task that has disabled signals (by overriding the signal handler), and
> loops generating signals?
I see. I was obsessed by reliability and did not realize that this is
the standard UNIX behaviour which the Hurd must comply with.
______________________________________________________________________
Jak si stoji kurz koruny? http://kurzy.seznam.cz
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Volkmar Uhlig, 2001/12/23
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?,
Ondrej Hurt <=