[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?
From: |
Farid Hajji |
Subject: |
Re: Why GNU Mach is so different? |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:28:30 +0100 (CET) |
> > You want to migrate _Mach_ ports over the net?
> Actualy, what I thought of was only port forwarding.
Okay, that is the "easy" part, but the problem with the forwarding
chains persists.
-Farid.
--
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
One OS To Rule Them All And In The Darkness Bind Them... --Bill Gates.
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?,
Farid Hajji <=
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/05
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/06
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/06
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/07
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/07
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Eray Ozkural (exa), 2002/01/09
- Re: Why GNU Mach is so different?, Farid Hajji, 2002/01/23