Re: PROPOSAL: making liblinux_net library

[Farid Hajji]

> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 05:12:30PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > Wrong.  The only reliance that um-pppd has on pfinet is a tunnel
> > device; everything else is pretty much standard.
> 
> And the tunnel device has all the semantics from the BSD tunnel device,
> because that was my reference implementation at that time.

We're probably not talking about the same ppp version anymore.
The tunnel device in pfinet behaves correctly, but try to compile
a recent ppp, e.g. taken ouf of the FreeBSD -STABLE or even -CURRENT
tree. Good luck! I'd be really impressed if that worked without Ng*()!!

-Farid.

-- 
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Admin | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany  | farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
One OS To Rule Them All And In The Darkness Bind Them... --Bill Gates.