[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: term & user space console
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: term & user space console |
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 15:00:37 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> I can make such requests, but how do I find out that the carrier really has
> been established? (Also, it would not allow servers to implement the open
> behaviour but not the tiocl bit mangling).
Yeah, you are correct here. You could assert DTR with the direct bit
frobbing things, but you also need to block until CTS/CD goes on. The
modem bit ioctls have to blocking mechanism for this.
Again, I have no objection to adding new interfaces to tioctl to make
all this better. There's no real need to bang our heads to coerce the
existing thing to work unchanged.
- Re: term & user space console, (continued)
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/30
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/30
- Re: term & user space console, Niels Möller, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Roland McGrath, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Roland McGrath, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31