Re: [Hurd-devel-readers] Re: Checks-syms results

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:

> Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> writes:
> 
> > I already asked Marcus and Jeff on IRC whether OSKit-Mach is going to
> > be gnumach 2.0. 
> 
> For what it's worth, I have no particular objection, however it's
> really a sort of one-shot switch.  Once we switch, we blow away the
> old gnumach, and we're switched, with whatever bugs that entails.  

Actually, I do have one concern.

gnumach, right now, is very careful to conform (as best as we could
make it) to the GNU Coding Standards, especially, those aspects like
the way the configure script works.  Currently OSKit doesn't seem to
work that way (though please correct me to the extent I'm incorrect).
That should be fixed before it becomes gnumach.

Thomas