[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch: use err, not errno
From: |
James Morrison |
Subject: |
Re: patch: use err, not errno |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:47:06 -0800 (PST) |
--- Roland McGrath <roland@gnu.org> wrote:
> Several of those instances used perror and you didn't change them.
> Changing them to use `error' instead of perror or perror and exit
> is fine.
> I'd have to examine all the surrounding code more closely to be
> sure there
> aren't other cases where the code calls something that uses errno.
>
I figured the code would need a second look, I tried to be as
conscientious as I could. I hadn't thought of perror to error, but
it would make things more consistant. Are there any more consistancy
things I should look for while reading through more code?
=====
James Morrison
University of Waterloo
Computer Science - Digital Hardware
2A co-op
http://hurd.dyndns.org
Anyone refering this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/