[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run.c translator
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: run.c translator |
Date: |
19 Mar 2002 14:54:24 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > You want the "shutdown" call, which should do the right thing.
>
> Does shutdown work on plain pipes, or is it it necessary to use
> socketpair instead of pipe? (Not that that is usually a problem, I'd
> recommend socketpair everytime, except if one actually needs the
> atomic PIPE_BUF behaviour).
>
> Does the Hurd's shutdown work on the (master side) of a pty as well?
I'm baffled. If it's a plain pipe, then you simply close the end
you're writing on, and the reader gets EOF.
I assumed the implementation used socketpairs, where closing your
writing half would prevent you from also reading on it.
Thomas
- run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/19
- Re: run.c translator,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Niels Möller, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/20
- Re: run.c translator, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/21