bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request


From: Jeroen Dekkers
Subject: Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:13:52 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:59:14PM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote:
> All in all, binary compatibility is a nice thing to have.

If it's only used for running non-free software I disagree. For free
software you can simply recompile the software. The only really reason
I see is that you can have the same Debian packages for GNU/Hurd and
GNU/Linux, which would same some few GBs in the archive. For this the
ABI has to be completely the same which still has some issues.

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

Attachment: pgptLNteNqkAJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]