[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:26:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:36:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is
> > failing. I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
> I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with
> stdio too. The iconv and gconv modules aren't that essential, we can
> fix it later IMHO. I don't know if there are other tests failing, I
> didn't have the time to check that.
The testsuite won't even run, which suggests larger problems. I'm not
worried about individual tests failing.
I suspect there's not alot to get right, and no reason we can't do it
this week.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
"Frankly, trying to turn Windows into a decent educational software
development platform is about as fun as jumping naked into a pit of
rabid wolves."
- As seen on slashdot
- libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/04
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Roland McGrath, 2002/04/07
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/07
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success,
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/04/08
- Re: libc0.3 with gcc-3.0 success, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/04/08