[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent checkins
From: |
Joachim Nilsson |
Subject: |
Re: Recent checkins |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2002 22:04:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:25:08AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:22:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > And we know more specifically that:
> > short int < int = long int.
> Is this true even on the PPC and Alpha ports? I thought 64 bit
> systems tended to still have 32 bit ints.
I *think* the story goes somethin like this...
Ints are mostly mapped onto what the data bus width can handle.
Shorts was initially half the size of an int and longs, well,
longs should be at least 32 (if I remember correctly).
Then one day architechtures moved from 8/16 to 32 and 64 bits and
things got messed up.
short int long long long
IA32 16 32 32 64
IA64 16 32 64 128
PPC 16 32 32 64
Sparc 16 32 32 64
Alpha 16 32 64 128
Regards
/Joachim
--
Joachim Nilsson <joachim.nilsson@vmlinux.org>
+46-(0)21-123348 <http://www.vmlinux.org/joachim/>
- Recent checkins, James Morrison, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Simon Law, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Jeff Bailey, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins,
Joachim Nilsson <=
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Jeff Bailey, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/08
- Re: Recent checkins, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/08