[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?)
|
From: |
Roland McGrath |
|
Subject: |
Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?) |
|
Date: |
Sat, 11 May 2002 17:16:47 -0400 (EDT) |
> Oh this is horrible. Sigh. However, in the normal case, the ids
> don't change. Is there a security reason we should not allow the user
> to decide for themselves?
"Allow the user to decide for themselves" does not have a precise meaning
to me in this context. Please specify.
- saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/10
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/10
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Roland McGrath, 2002/05/11
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/11
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?),
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/11
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Roland McGrath, 2002/05/11
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/12
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: saved IDs and exec (standard violation?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12