[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fakeroot status
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: fakeroot status |
Date: |
Tue, 14 May 2002 22:33:18 -0400 (EDT) |
> It is either indistinguishable, in which case it doesn't need to
> exist, or it has *some* difference in semantics--any difference
> whatsoever--in which case it should not share the same identity port.
You seem to be talking about some general principle of filesystem
properness. In the case of a translator like fakeroot, its purpose is
convenient deception and whatever deceits are most convenient are the right
choices.
- Re: fakeroot status, (continued)
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14