Re: posix_spawn in gcc

[James Morrison]

--- Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> wrote:
> I think there was also some sentiment that people would not object to using
> posix_spawnp on Linux if the generic glibc implementation were made more
> efficient.  The only efficiency that can really be gotten in a generic
> POSIX.1 implementation over what glibc has now is to avoid using malloc
> when there are only a small number of file actions.
> 

 So is this something that can be done for libc 2.3?


=====
James Morrison
   University of Waterloo
   Computer Science - Digital Hardware
   2A co-op
http://hurd.dyndns.org

Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com