Re: Glibc without installed headers

[Jeff Bailey]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:34:54PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

> > > Like, should I be able to build glibc without glibc headers
> > > installed.  Right now hurd/ and mach/ depend on files that are
> > > already installed.

> > They should depend only on headers install by gcc, and by "make
> > install-headers" for mach and hurd.

> Well, the Hurd definition files depend on glibc headers:
> bits/utsname.h in hurd_types.defs, which sucks in a couple of
> others.  This did hurt me when compiling glibc, but I forgot where
> exactly.  ioctls.defs also includes bits/ioctls.h, but I don't
> remember this being a problem.

The one that had nailed me was bits/stdio_lim.h.  I don't have my
notes handy (I was using a different machine), that file isn't built
until after the mach/ directory is finished.

I'll post more notes today.

-- 
I reincarnated for this?