[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: n-hurd networking

From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Subject: Re: n-hurd networking
Date: 07 Aug 2002 12:30:09 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Simon Law <sfllaw@uwaterloo.ca> writes:

>       Wouldn't it be easier to have the Hurd running closest to the
> hardware, the one on boot, have full control of the network?  Any
> sub-Hurds could be running on a private internal network, and the
> primary Hurd could do NAT.

I wasn't speaking of subhurds, but of collectives.  Perhaps I
misunderstood the original question.  ("n-hurd" is not a normal term
I'm familiar with.)

If the different Hurds are sharing a single network device (like
subhurds) then obviously a totally different strategy of solution is

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]