[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: n-hurd networking
From: |
Simon Law |
Subject: |
Re: n-hurd networking |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:49:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 12:47:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Simon Law <sfllaw@uwaterloo.ca> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 12:30:09PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > I wasn't speaking of subhurds, but of collectives. Perhaps I
> > > misunderstood the original question. ("n-hurd" is not a normal term
> > > I'm familiar with.)
> >
> > Are you talking about clusters? It seems that that is what
> > you're discussing, but I'm not sure.
>
> I'm not going to answer that, because explaining one buzzword with
> another rarely helps.
>
> A Hurd collective is a set of separate machines connected by something
> like ethernet, which want to present the appearance to users and the
> world of being a single Posix system.
I see. That is what the BSD people call a "Cluster of
Workstations" and I think Progeny wanted to do something of that ilk
with their Progeny NOW distribution.
Simon
- n-hurd networking, Hisham Kotry, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, James Morrison, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
Re: n-hurd networking, Niels Möller, 2002/08/07