[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: n-hurd networking
From: |
Simon Law |
Subject: |
Re: n-hurd networking |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:55:29 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 01:39:08PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> You say "don't mix datalink and network protocols", but I'm not sure
> what you mean by "mix" here. If you mean that net filters are the
> wrong way to filter, then fine--just continue to receive all packets,
> and ignore in pfinet the ones that aren't destined for the "local" IP
> address. Then you have multiple listeners on the device, and
> everything still just works.
Yes, that should be how it works. This way, you are exposing
the entire network device to each operating system running on that one
machine; and you do not arbitrarily limit utility.
Simon
- Re: n-hurd networking, (continued)
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, James Morrison, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking,
Simon Law <=
- Re: n-hurd networking, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/08/07
- Re: n-hurd networking, Simon Law, 2002/08/07
Re: n-hurd networking, Niels Möller, 2002/08/07
n-hurd networking, Hisham Kotry, 2002/08/08