[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
From: |
Nicola Girardi |
Subject: |
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:08:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
> Was there any agreement on how to procced with fixing the 1GB limit?
If I remember correctly, a guy showed up and offered to write an
ext3 server in a way so that it would not suffer that limit and
maybe allow ACLs, then he went to the background. It would be nice
if he could show up once more and tell us if he's doing any progress.
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., (continued)
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Joshua Judson Rosen, 2002/12/06
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Roland McGrath, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/08
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Niels Möller, 2002/12/09
- Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/09
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion., Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/06
Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.,
Nicola Girardi <=