bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.


From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 20:43:00 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:12:24PM -0600, Tom Hart wrote:
> Doesn't this kind of go against the Hurdish "no arbitrary limits" 
> philosophy, ie. no MATHPATHLEN, MAXHOSTLEN, etc.?
> 
> I agree that 2^64 bits is amazingly huge. But doesn't this sort of 
> assumption tend to lead to problems later on down the road?

If the answer to your last question is yes, then it is also yes to the
first.

If the answer to your last question is no, then it is also no to the first.

Thanks,
Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]