bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.


From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Subject: Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 03:28:42 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:53:42PM -0500, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> 64-bit systems do not necessarily give you 64-bits of virtual address
> space (even discounting the kernel's area).  Alpha, for instance, only
> gives you 43 bits.  There are real practical reasons for doing this:
> the page tables become far too deep and costly for no benefit (8k
> pages => 13 bits + 10k entries per page table * 3 levels of page
> tables).


If you use 8Kbyte pages. 64Kbyte pages gives you already 55 bits of virtual
address space. 

:)

Cheers,

p2.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]