Re: [OT]: Hurd microkernel portability.

[Cherry George Mathew]

> 
> I'm not sure what you mean with `ripping up the libc library once
> again'.
> 

Quoting Neal below:
> meet its requirements.  In the Hurd, the primary users of ports are
> libports and glibc.

Sorry for the confusion.


> <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/l4-hurd/2002-October/000692.html>


Thanks so much. I think I need to start re-lurking on the l4-hurd list.
:)

> 
> > It tickles to me read things like, "netbsd, the most portable OS in
> > the world", and stuff like that.
> 
> Anything wrong with that?
> 

Oh, well:

start_possible_flame()

GNU/Hurd ultimately needs to be 'THE OS'. We can't compromise on that,
can we ??

end_possible_flame().

Cheers,

George.

-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
Quote for the Week:

 - "If the ax is dull and its edge unsharpened, more strength is 
    needed but skill will bring success." (Ecclesiastes 10:10 NIV)

Cherry George Mathew,                                     /~\ The ASCII
II/157, Thyparampil Veedu,                                \ / Ribbon
Campaign
Eraviperoor P.O                                            X  Against
Kerala,                                                   / \ HTML
e-mail
India 689542,
Tel:+91-473-663982
http://resumes.yahoo.com/berryplumis/myprofile/