[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec and EXECSERVERS
|
From: |
Roland McGrath |
|
Subject: |
Re: exec and EXECSERVERS |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:56:34 -0500 (EST) |
> I think there were just bugs and rather than figure them out, we
> commented it out. I think it would certainly be useful to turn it on
> and make it work.
There may have been bugs. There were also security concerns about
an EXECSERVERS being inherited indirectly by setuid programs and the like.
- exec and EXECSERVERS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/20