[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts
|
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:21:18 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:30:14 +0100,
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> It's hard to believe you get no package loss in GNU Mach 1. Do you flood
> the GNU/Hurd box from a GNU/Linux box? I have seen horrible package loss in
> that situation, which was much better with GNUMach v2.
I think that's not because of GNU Mach itself but because of the
driver you use. In fact, I didn't see so much packet loss when I
tested it with my NIC (probably eepro100 or 3c59x).
Cheers,
Okuji
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Daniel Wagner, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Daniel Wagner, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/30
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=