[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple? |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:23:17 +0200 |
Forgive me my ignorance, but wasn't the kernel the Hurd, while gnumach,
oskit-mach, L4 are just microkernels underneath? I'd have expected
i386-pc-hurd-gnu with no place currently to put the l4/gnumach variant
of the Hurd.
It depends on how picky you want to be with the definition of a
kernel. The Hurd replaces what traditionally was done in kernel space
on *nix, so in that sense it might be called a kernel. But if you
define a kernel as something that runs in kernel space, then it is not
a kernel. In short it is a little of both. :)
- Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/03
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/04/04
- Binutils patches, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Binutils patches, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Jeff Bailey, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Roland McGrath, 2003/04/04
- Re: Reporting the Microkernel in the GNU triple?, Niels Möller, 2003/04/08