bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool (branch-1-5) report


From: Robert Millan
Subject: Re: libtool (branch-1-5) report
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:45:40 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Good news, libtool (branch-1-5) compiles, and runs the testsuite on
> GNU/Hurd without a single failure.  It was compiled with gcc 3.2 and
> binutils 2.14, running libc 2.3.2 (with a minor patch).  And the
> output of the compile and testsuite are inlined.

Thanks! Could you also try HEAD? It's not very clear wether the next release
will be 1.5.1 or 1.6, although 1.6 will be there roughly in a pair of months.

There's also the question that the "gnu*)" test case in libtool.m4 doesn't have
as many defined variables than other GNU-like systems. Comparing to
"kfreebsd*-gnu" and "knetbsd*-gnu", the following are missing:

  shlibpath_overrides_runpath=no
  dynamic_linker='GNU ld.so'

Any comments on this? Perhaps we should ask the libtool maintainers.

-- 
Robert Millan

"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."

 -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]