Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report

[James Michael DuPont]

--- "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> wrote:
>    > Well, I have been working on Hurd, porting the hurd subsystem to
>    > the gcc under linux so that you can compile it. That will allow
>    > us to use the introspector on it.
> 
> Why not just port the introspector to GNU/Hurd, and run it in
> GNU/Hurd?  You don't need to do ugly things (and useles) like getting
> things compiling in GNU/Linux.  Or you could just use a
> cross-compiler
> which are simple to make if you have /lib and /include.

Well, I might do that some time. RIght now I am happy to be able to
compile without rebooting and installing all this stuff. 

In fact, I think that other people will like to be able to use this
when it is ready for distribution.

> No it doesn't.
> No it isn't.

Looks like you have been watching too much Monty Python :
http://jokes4u.port5.com/montypython/ArgumentSkit.html

"" PUNTER It isn't. Argument's an intellectual process - contradiction
is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
BENNETT No it isn't.
PUNTER Yes it IS!
BENNETT Not at all.""

It is too boring to argue with you.

Mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com