[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core dump (semi) update
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: Core dump (semi) update |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:33:33 -0500 (EST) |
> > This is clearly wrong, it being zero. This suggests to me that
> > elfcore_grok_lwpstatus still does not have
> > HAVE_LWPSTATUS_T_PR_FPREG. Can you check that again?
> >
> > Yes, it is defined and all.
>
> Then you will have to step through that function to see what it is
> doing. I can't see how it would wind up with zero.
>
> That data that it is copying into lwpstat is mostly zero.
That does not explain the zero section size. Please step through the code.
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, (continued)
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Roland McGrath, 2004/02/07
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/08
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Roland McGrath, 2004/02/08
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/10
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/10
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Roland McGrath, 2004/02/10
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/11
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Roland McGrath, 2004/02/11
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/12
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/13
- Re: Core dump (semi) update,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/02/14
- Re: Core dump (semi) update, Roland McGrath, 2004/02/17