[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uptime (coreutils)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: uptime (coreutils) |
Date: |
13 Mar 2004 22:34:00 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
James Morrison <ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> writes:
> We have libhurduser, libshouldbeinlibc, would either of those work?
libhurduser is only for MiG generated stubs. libshouldbeinlibc is the
right place in general, but it's a holding place for things you really
do intend to migrate into libc.
> We probably could have a libhurd.
Eek, no. libc.
- uptime (coreutils), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/03/13
- Re: uptime (coreutils), James Morrison, 2004/03/13
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/03/13
- Re: uptime (coreutils), James Morrison, 2004/03/13
- Re: uptime (coreutils),
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14