[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal

From: Neal H. Walfield
Subject: Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:19:25 -0400
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryƍmae) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At 17 Aug 2004 03:07:14 -0700,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> writes:
> > You are probably confused because "map" can have 2 meanings:
> > 
> > 1. Mapping page of address space to page of pager.
> > 2. Mapping page of pager to disk block.
> > 
> > And the current ext2fs relies heavily on the ability to remap (2).
> Let's reserve "map" for the former, because that's the meaning it has
> in Mach.

I agree.  Let's agree to call the later an association.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]