Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:

>    So why not off_t in the structure instead?
> 
> Well, either we use off_t or we use loff_t (or even off64_t).  Is
> there any rule as to what should be used?  Because I don't have a real
> opinion about it (other then maybe that loff_t is clearer then off_t)

Well, we should pick one.  I don't remember how wide we are using for
the io.defs protocol, which really should specify.  Are they all the
same?