[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rc & runsystem
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: rc & runsystem |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:57:41 -0800 (PST) |
> Or did you mean "not to overwrite existing stuff"? If you didn't then
> we both agree, and this whole discussion was pointless.
No, I said overwrite selectively. You want it to overwrite some
executables and not others, just because these two are implemented as
scripts you don't use the vanilla implementations of them. If you want
selectivity in which of the executables to install, that has to be a
nondefault option.
- Re: rc & runsystem, (continued)
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/12/18
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/25
- Re: rc & runsystem, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17