[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pthread headers

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: pthread headers
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:55:53 +0100
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:48:24 +0200,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.info> wrote:
> [1  <multipart/signed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On 20050111T174249+0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> >    I would expect GCC to eventually fix its inline handling to conform with
> >    C99 
> > 
> > The problem isn't C99, but C90, __inline is handled differently than
> > inline by gcc.  The former works even with -ansi enabled.
> I was under the impression that __inline is an alias for inline, with no
> semantic differences.  If I'm correct, then extern __inline will change
> semantics when extern inline does.

Yes, this is likely, see also the file CONFORMANCE in the glibc source tree.

We can probably just piggy-back on glibc on this issue, and ignore it
until it is fixed there.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]