[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: console translator set without encoding
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: console translator set without encoding |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:19:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Danilo Segan <dsegan@gmx.net> writes:
> What are you going to do when you come across a filesystem where you
> have two files with such names which only differ in normalisation form
> used (i.e. fully decomposed or fully composed)? Yeah, you can ensure
> that no filesystem created via GNU/Hurd is going to have such
> instances, but what about filesystems created elsewhere?
>
> Are you going to treat such filesystems as erroneous?
>
>
> Filenames are 8-bit ASCII compatible strings (UTF-FS as in
> "filesystem-safe" originally), and that's all you need to know to make
> POSIX-compliant programs.
This unfortunately fully depends on the filesystem. Or do you mean
the interface to the filesystem?
--
Marco
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/21
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/22
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/22
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/22
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Samuel Thibault, 2005/01/23
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/23
- Re: console translator set without encoding,
Marco Gerards <=
- Re: console translator set without encoding, Danilo Segan, 2005/01/23
Re: console translator set without encoding, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/22
Re: console translator set without encoding, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek, 2005/01/23