[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DHCP support
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: DHCP support |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:14:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes:
>
> > As the DHCP script sets things to 0.0.0.0 anyway, I am a bit puzzled why
> > this has to be a user-visable option.
>
> Because without this patch, such things are not possible. Setting the
> address to 0.0.0.0 was not possible, but now it is.
Sure, but I was only going at the --dhcp option. When I first saw it, I
thought it was a convenience option for users. However, as I understand
it, you can set pfinet to 0.0.0.0 with your patch without using --dhcp,
and as this is hidden in some script, there is no use in calling it
--dhcp if you can call it -a 0.0.0.0 [...] just as well. And I believe this
(perhaps from another angle) this is Roland's criticism as well.
Your patch is very useful of course, I just think we do not need an
explicit --dhcp function but rather should make -a 0.0.0.0 [...] work
equivalently (if this is not already the case) and use that in scripts.
Michael
- Re: DHCP support, (continued)
- Re: DHCP support, Roland McGrath, 2005/04/13
- Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Joachim Nilsson, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Joachim Nilsson, 2005/04/14
- Re: DHCP support, Michael Banck, 2005/04/14
Re: DHCP support, Michael Banck, 2005/04/14
Re: DHCP support, Roland McGrath, 2005/04/14
Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/14
Re: DHCP support, Roland McGrath, 2005/04/14
Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/15
Re: DHCP support, Roland McGrath, 2005/04/15
Re: DHCP support, Marco Gerards, 2005/04/15
Re: DHCP support, Roland McGrath, 2005/04/15
Re: DHCP support, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/04/15