Re: oskit-stomach hd0s4: No such device or address

[Gianluca Guida]

Hey,

thanks for trying stomach out and for even getting a log. 

On 8/26/05, Shakthi Kannan <shakstux@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I find the console response to be much faster than
> gnumach. Have you given lot of printfs during the boot
> code?

Faster? Hmm, perhaps there are just a lot of printfs and so everything
seems to scroll faster, since the console driver is exactly the same.

> The startup bootlog sequence on the T41:
Wow, That's that IS useful!

> vm_page_grab: no dma anymoremem_free: hash search
> failed (0)!

See, this seems to be a very very bad thing. Even if I almost rewrote
that piece of code recently. It was immorally broken.

> It probes for floppy and spends lot of time there. Can
> I disable the floppy detection?

Hmm, by hacking a bit the code. Perhaps I/we should make this option
available in the configure script. But I want to wait for this, since
I want to rationalize the configure/automake thing by following recent
GNU Mach changes affecting these scripts.

Gianluca

-- 
It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and
they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been
introduced to electronic engineers.
                                                  E. W. Dijkstra