[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads)
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads) |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:31:05 +0200 |
Judging from the bits posted by Thomas, I'm pretty sure this macro
(DL_ARGV_NOT_RELRO) should be defined for hurd-i386, like it is for
sparc, ia64 and alpha.
This isn't a reason why it should be defined. You are confusing code
that is specific for a operating system and a arch, and code that is
only specific for a arch. Now, if you said that DL_ARGV_NOT_RELRO
should be defined on ia32 (sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h), then you'd have
a point.
Looking into this now.
- The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Thomas Schwinge, 2005/09/21
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Thomas Schwinge, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Manuel Menal, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads),
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Thomas Schwinge, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Thomas Schwinge, 2005/09/22
- Re: The recent glibc breakage (dynamically linking with libthreads), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/09/22