[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: commit access policies
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: commit access policies |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:32:25 +0100 |
> So there is no reason not to revert the `bug fixes only' rule for
> gnumach-1-branch, if there is a tier one who checks patches.
Incorrect; if your reasoning is right (and I want to hear from
others too) then the thing to do is to swap the HEAD designation.
By swapping gnumach-1-branch to HEAD, you are essentially reverting
the bug-fix-only rule anyway, kinda. Work would still be done on the
code base that is gnumach-1-branch, but not on that branch.
- Re: commit access policies, (continued)
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14